Here are some important and distinguishing features that make both the R3 and S2 amazing bikes. Learn about other aspects of the S2 that make it a great bike.
Comparing the Cervelo S2 to the R3
Overall, the S2 is a faster bike at high speed; the R3 is faster at accelerating and climbing. The S2 will get you to your destination slightly faster; the R3 will get you to your destination slightly more refreshed.
Here are some details:
Cervelo S2 |
Cervelo R3 |
|
| Ideal Use | The S2 is all about maximizing aerodynamic advantage at high-speed. Speed over comfort. Best on rides shorter than 45 miles; however, it’s worth noting that Thor Hushovd has won numerous cobblestone classics on his S2! | Racing and competitive rides. Works well over any distance. |
| Rider position | A bit lower for an improved aero position. Very much road racing position. | A great neutral racing position. Well suited for fit riders on road rides. Not ideal for centuries or riders looking for a more upright position. |
| Handling | This is a road racing bike; it is not time-trial geometry. Great for road racing and road riding. Fairly quick handling well suited for group rides and all types of road racing. Similar handling to the R3 – depending on the rider position. | This is Cervelo’s primary road racing and road riding bike. The R3’s handling reflects this mission. Quick but not squirrelly. |
| Speed | The S-Series are the fastest road bikes on the planet. The S2’s aero tubing provides more speed per watt than the R3. | Extremely stiff drivetrain for great acceleration and sprinting. If out of corner acceleration is of primary importance, the R3 is the ideal bike. |
| Weight | At just over 1,000 grams – depending on frame size – the S2 is just a few grams heavier than the R3. | The Second lightest road model that Cervelo offers – right behind the R5 series |
| Price | Same as the R3. Example: Ultegra: $4,000 |
Same as the S2. Example: Ultegra: $4,00 |
